At risk of being abused for my armchairyness (I do, after all, live in
Leeds unlike lots of you listers), wasn't Sky's coverage last night
blatantly biased?

I mean I'm not one of those chip on my shoulder Leeds fans, but the way
they highlighted everything that Leeds players did - eg Beckford's elbow
to the keeper's jaw but almost totally ignored the fact that he'd been
elbowed first, or the forearm smash on Robinson, or the shove in the
back that lead to Marques 'fouling' their player for a 'penalty', even
down to the closing montage with Grayson laughing right after the
Robinson elbow - was outrageous.

To me, it was a tough game, played by committed players, all of which
were equally competitive, or equally bad, depending on how you like to
see things.  To Sky, it was a team of Frank Booths and Hannibal Lecters
vs Luby-Loos and Hambles!

And why do Sky never have anyone out and out Leeds as their sumerupper?
If it's not Dave 'wanker' Bassett it's Michael
'canIhavesomefreephysiowhileI'mhereworkingforSky?' Bridges.

Nice victory though.

DRB



_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
Sorry Macca - it's the curse of Bates old lad

Reply via email to