Owt for a quiet life eh! Don't you understand the longer it goes on the more complicated it will become. I'm afraid I don't agree with a word you say and I'm sure it was explained perfectly and crystal clear by the last poster, Simon Cunningham.
On 6 Mar 2010, at 17:35, Dr Michael Benjamin wrote: > Simon > I am not defending the set up > It is not a good one > All I am saying is that it should not be changed retro actively > Next buyer in should be 'transparent' --- fine by me. > But do not start to 'shake our tree' again. God knows what 'll fall out and > on who. > We all know that 'off the field ' soon becomes 'on the field'. > Our form is precarious. We cannot allow any distractions. > > I am sure that there are many more bad reasons than good ones why people > want to stay in the shadows. > But we have one very good reason not to alter things now. > > It could wreck us completely if we play around with this. > All the do -gooders and and fellow travellers have nothing to lose. > We have everything to lose. > > When this bunch sell then have an 'open sale'. > > But let's all get real here. Whoever invested put money on an old man with a > dubious track record and a very dodgy team. This was a very high risk > venture. They will make a lot out of the eventual sale. But they can only > sell when there is something to sell. Because of Bates age I should imagine > that they will sell when we go up. As they are unnamed and important to stay > that way they are in a mess if Bates pops his clogs. > > Bloody ironic we got decimated by a 'supporter living the dream' & saved by > a calculating knave. > > Michael _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist and the hardest time in a sailor's day is to watch the sun as it sails away
