The global capitalist crisis (part VII)
The global crisis and Marxism

The following article was published in "The Guardian", newspaper
of the Communist Party of Australia in its issue of Wednesday,
December 16th, 1998. Contact address: 65 Campbell Street, Surry
Hills.
Sydney. 2010 Australia. Fax: (612) 9281 5795.
Email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Webpage: http://www.peg.apc.org/~guardian
Subscription rates on request.
******************************

By Anna Pha
One of the common criticisms of Marxism by its opponents is that
a theory developed 150 years ago is out of date and irrelevant.
In the years since Karl Marx and Frederick Engels wrote the
"Communist Manifesto", capitalism has certainly undergone many
changes but it remains capitalism none-the-less.

The present world-wide crisis shows that capitalism is incapable
of resolving its problems. Some aspects raised in this series of
articles include:

* the growth of monopolies into TNCs,
* the predominance of finance capital over industrial capital,
* financial speculation,
* the intensified exploitation of workers,
* a crisis of overproduction,
* the pauperisation of millions of people.

Accumulation of capital

In the present conditions, who could doubt the basic law of
capitalism as enunciated by Marx: "The directing motive, the end
aim of capitalist production, is to extract the greatest possible
amount of surplus value, and consequently to exploit labour power
to the greatest possible extent." (Marx K. "Capital", Progress
Publishers, Vol I, p 313)

The annual reports of companies reveal the record profits and
rapid accumulation of capital, particularly by the largest
corporations and big banks.

The assets (that is, the accumulated capital) of the top 1,000
companies in Australia have more than doubled from $932 billion
in 1993 to $2,151 billion in 1998. (IBIS, "Business Review
Weekly", "The Top 1000'', Oct 22, 1998)

This was achieved by increasing the rate of exploitation of
workers -- the attacks on wages and conditions, use of contract
and casual labour, unpaid overtime, longer working hours, mass
sackings, speed-up and the use of new technology.

The periodical crises of overproduction as predicted by Marx have
continued irrespective of the different governments and theories
Šimplemented. Governments and capitalist apologists have never let
up trying to find ways of smoothing out the cycle or softening
the landings.

After the big crash and Great Depression of the 1930s, Keynesian
economics came to the fore, advocating some state intervention
and regulation to stabilise and stimulate the economy during
times of crisis. But Keynesian theories did nothing to remove the
basic profit-making purpose of capital and the exploitation of
the working people.

>From free competition to monopoly

The relatively unregulated, small scale enterprises of the 19th
Century gradually gave way to the development of monopolies.

"Competition becomes transformed into monopoly", said Lenin.
("Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism", Lenin "Collected
Works" Vol 22 p 205)

"This transformation of competition into monopoly is one of the
most important -- if not the most important phenomena of modern
capitalist economy..." (ibid, p 197)

Today's transnational corporations (TNCs) grew out of these big
monopoly concerns as they spread their activities, not just
trading in goods but making capital investments and loans around
the world.

"Typical of the old capitalism, when free competition held
undivided sway, was the exports of "goods". Typical of the latest
stage of capitalism, when monopolies rule, is the export of
"capital"." (Ibid p 240)

Domination of finance capital

The monopolisation process applies equally to the banks and other
financial institutions.

The banks "collect all kinds of money revenues and place them at
the disposal of the capitalist class", wrote Lenin.

"As banking develops and becomes concentrated in a small number
of establishments, the banks grow from modest middlemen into
powerful monopolies having at their command almost the whole of
the money capital of all the capitalists and small businessmen
and also the larger part of the means of production and sources
of raw material in any one country and in a number of countries."
(Ibid p.210)

In Australia four big banks and two insurance companies dominate
the market. The financial institutions hold the top controlling
shareholdings of almost all of the top 50 corporations. They
control industrial capital.

Š"The 'business operations' of capitalist monopolies inevitably
lead to the domination of a financial oligarchy". (Ibid p 226)

The banks did not create one cent of the wealth that they have
accumulated from interest, gambling and, more recently, fees and
business "services". Their riches are appropriated from the
wealth created by workers.

The surplus value (gross profit) of the top 100 companies in
Australia last year was around $80 billion.

The banks pocketed $42 billion -- around half -- as interest.

Only $11 billion was paid in taxes.

The banks also directly extract billions more from workers'
pockets with their 15 per cent or so interest on the $5 billion
credit card debts and the interest on the $100 billion of housing
loans by the banks. (They pay interest as low as 0.01 per cent on
workers' savings.)

Globally, around 10 financial institutions are dominant but the
mergers and takeovers continue. The recent merger of Deutsche
Bank and Bankers Trust is the latest example.

Imperialism

Lenin listed five features of imperialism:

"1. the concentration of production and capital has developed to
such a high stage that it has created monopolies which play a
decisive role in economic life;

2. the merging of bank capital with industrial capital, and the
creation, of the basis of this 'finance capital', of a financial
oligarchy;

3. the export of capital as distinguished from the export of
commodities acquires exceptional importance;

4. the formation of international monopolist capitalist
associations which share the world among themselves; and

5. the territorial division of the whole world among the biggest
capitalist powers is completed.

"Imperialism is capitalism at that stage of development at which
the dominance of monopolies and finance capital is
established..." (Ibid p 266)

Lenin wrote "Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism" in
1916 but its conclusions remain strikingly relevant today.

Parasitism

ŠLenin also emphasised the parasitism and decay of capitalism,
characteristic of monopoly. He pointed to the rentiers, the
people who live by "clipping coupons", who take no part in
production and "whose profession is idleness".

Their parasitism has reached new heights with the gambling on
stock markets and speculative trading in currencies, futures,
options and other derivatives. The hedge funds have taken
parasitism and decay almost beyond the realms of imagination.

State monopoly capitalism

The emergence of state monopoly capitalism during the 20th
Century saw the merging of the state and capital.

"The `personal link-up' between the banks and industry is
supplemented by the personal link-up' between both of them and
the government." (Lenin Ibid p 221).

In the period following the Second World War the state has played
a considerable role in assisting monopoly capital.

It gives direct financial assistance, legislates tax exemptions,
imposes discriminatory tax systems, subsidises the supply of gas
and electricity, provides lucrative contracts for infrastructure
and for military hardware, etc. It helps the capitalist class
exploit the labour of workers by restraining wages and working
conditions and implements legislation to penalise trade union
struggles.

For a certain period and under pressure from the gains made by
workers in socialist countries and by the workers' struggles in
the capitalist countries, the capitalist state was seen to have a
responsibility for people's welfare. Hence, the "welfare state"
with its aged pension, public education system, health services,
public housing, etc. This period has now come to an end.

Globalisation

The steady growth of monopolies led inevitably to the emergence
of transnational corporations (TNCs) and the demands of the TNCs
led to the replacement of Keynesian economics by "economic
rationalism" or "neoliberalism".

The new agenda involved the sweeping away of all the controls
constructed in the Keynesian period (deregulation), the
privatisation of all public enterprises and withdrawal of the
state from anything that could be done by the private sector. The
"welfare state", so we are told, is no longer affordable and has
to be disposed of.

In order to sweeten the bitter pill of capitalism and to obscure
the real control of the TNCs, theories of convergence and "common
interests" between capital and labour are advanced. Ideas about a
"people's capitalism" are propagated to encourage workers to
Šbecome shareholders. This is also a means of making workers'
savings available for use by the monopolies and banks.

However, none of these developments alters the basic fact that
the production of goods and services is achieved by the
collective labour of millions of workers while what they produce
and the proceeds of services goes into the pockets of the owners
of the means of production.

Today, economic rationalism and the directives of the IMF (which
is one of those capitalist "associations" that Lenin mentioned)
are moving in the direction of the naked and direct dictatorship
of capital by the TNCs.

Sovereignty paramount

In the East Asian crisis the IMF steadfastly rejected the wishes
of the governments wishing to establish controls over the private
sector although none of the governments had any thought of doing
away with the capitalist system. The IMF forced these governments
to leave it to the "markets" with devastating consequences.

"... the struggle of the great powers for the economic and
political division of the world, gives rise to a number of
"transitional" forms of state dependence ... countries which,
politically, are formally independent, but in fact, are enmeshed
in the net of financial and diplomatic dependence..." (Lenin Ibid
p 263)

Apart from the economic devastation they cause, the IMF, the
World Bank and the World Trade Organisation in particular, deny
the people of many countries the right to determine their own
affairs through elected governments or other means.

How far?

Under the conditions of TNC domination the effects are becoming
more extreme and on a global basis. Mass unemployment and
impoverishment face the working people of many countries. Working
conditions and rights are deteriorating rapidly. How far will
this process be allowed to go?

Resistance is growing around the world with strike struggles,
demonstrations, the emergence of powerful people's organisations
campaigning for progressive policies. Capitalism's political and
economic instability is convincing more people that this system
does not work for them. The internationalisation of economic
relations will continue, the question is who will control the
changes and who will benefit.

The international solidarity and co-ordination of struggles
becomes more imperative than ever and the defeat of the MAI shows
what can be achieved by the unity of progressive forces on a
worldwide basis. These struggles are building a broad alliance of
social and political forces.
Š
At the same time the question of winning working class power
becomes more urgent, which demands that communist, trade union
and other working class organisations be strengthened.

More and more people are searching for an alternative, it is up
to the communists to show there is an alternative that puts
people first. It is called socialism.

end
==============
   Leftlink - Australia's Broad Left Mailing List
       As vilified, slandered and attacked by One Nation
                           mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        http://www.alexia.net.au/~www/mhutton/index.html
   
       Sponsored by Melbourne's New International Bookshop
 Subscribe:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=subscribe%20leftlink
Unsubscribe:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20leftlink

Reply via email to