Quebec: Day One Report
By Judy Rebick


It's not easy to upstage the opening of meeting with 34 leaders including 
U.S. President George Bush.  Despite what seemed like endless volleys of 
tear gas, mostly peaceful protesters came back again and again  to Rene 
Levesque Boulevard in Quebec City to face down the police and in so doing 
captured the attention of world media.

The battle lasted almost two hours as police chased demonstrators off the 
plateau  with heavy use of tear gas and demonstrators came back after 
recovering from the stinging pain in their eyes and throats.  The most 
poignant moment was a sit down of about 20 people, flashing peace signs in 
the midst of a fog of tear gas.

Most media attention is on the perimeter breach and it was an impressive 
action. First a few then more climbed up the chain-link, surrounded the 
center of the city to protect the Summit of the Americas, and in a rocking 
action pushed it down. By my watch it took less than five minutes for the 
hated fence to come down. The amazing thing was that only about 100 people 
rushed through the fence. The rest held back.  It was the protesters not 
the police who controlled the crowd.  I was astounded at the discipline. 
There were ten or twenty people out of about 3,000 throwing stones and 
bottles. In the march that wound its way along 6 miles  from Laval 
University to the perimeter, these were the Black Bloc.  While the rest of 
the protest was noisy and colourful, they were somber, solemn, dressed all 
in black, several armed with sticks and stones and masked from the 
beginning of the march.

No doubt there will be debates about the Black Bloc tactics.  The 
creativity of the other demonstrators were lost in the confrontation.  One 
group calling itself the Medieval Bloc had built a 20- foot catapult and 
managed to maneuver it up to police lines.  Then they hurled three stuffed 
toys into the police.  One woman dressed as the Statue of Liberty walked 
all the way from Laval on stilts. Another group of women calling themselves 
"The Dandelions" wore T-shirts with painted slogans like "the persistent 
radical blossom that will always bloom."  A young man painted his T-shirt 
with the phrase, "It's hard to hit a movement target."

Once the perimeter went down, all attention was on the intensity of the 
confrontation.  And it was intense.  This was the red/yellow march. That 
means there was a high chance of confrontation with the police.  As 
demonstrators approached the perimeter, marshals announced that people 
wanting a green (safe) zone should turn left.  No one did.  Thousands 
approached the perimeter.  They ran when the tear gas exploded but they 
came back, time after time for two hours.

One of the most extraordinary developments on Friday was the formation of a 
Canadian Labour Movement affinity group.  Affiliates of the Canadian Labour 
Congress formally decided to join the direct action.

Friday was the direct action day.  Today Saturday is to be the mass action 
day.  But more than 5,000 people showed up at Laval University for the 
march to the perimeter knowing that it would almost certainly lead to 
confrontation with the police.

There have been long debates about what should happen today when an 
estimated 40,000 people are expected to join the People's March of the 
Americas.  Organizers of today's march have decided to march away from the 
perimeter they say for safety reasons.  With so many people involved and 
the narrow streets of this beautiful old city, people could get trapped 
against the wall and hurt.

Others have argued that it is politically wrong to avoid the perimeter 
fence, which has become a hated symbol of the reduction of public space 
that free trade is inflicted upon us.  What likely will happen is once the 
main march is over a group will split off and march to the wall.

Organizers of the People's Summit are upset about Friday's action.  They 
feel it brings discredit down on the movement .  But it seems to me that it 
is direct confrontation with the police that has drawn so many youth into 
the struggle against anti-democratic trade deals.

It is true that there have been many important developments in Quebec City 
for the movement against free trade.  For the first time, civil society 
across the Americas has agreed on a single political statement and a common 
strategy (pushing for a continental referendum and referendum in every 
country ) to fight the FTAA (Free Trade Area of the Americas).  The 
importance of this development cannot be overestimated.  Up until a few 
years ago, the Latin American labor movement favoured free trade.  But the 
impact of NAFTA on Mexico, further impoverishing the Mexican working class, 
has persuaded them to join the anti-free trade forces.

Organizers of the People's Summit feel that the violence of the direct 
action diverts attention from their hard won gains.  But as the saying 
goes, this is what democracy looks like.  In a real mass movement, no one 
can control what happens.  There are always differences.  The trick, it 
seems to me, is to debate the differences but not get diverted or divided 
by them.

Judy Rebick is the publisher of www.rabble.ca a new interactive online 
magazine.

 >From Znet: http://www.zmag.org


--

           Leftlink - Australia's Broad Left Mailing List
                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Archived at http://www.cat.org.au/lists/leftlink/

Sponsored by Melbourne's New International Bookshop
Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=subscribe%20leftlink
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20leftlink

Reply via email to