The following Editorial was published in "The Guardian", newspaper of 
the Communist Party of Australia in its issue of Wednesday, March 12, 2003.
Contact address: 65 Campbell Street, Surry Hills. Sydney. 2010 Australia.
Phone: (612) 9212 6855 Fax: (612) 9281 5795.
CPA Central Committee: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"The Guardian": <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Webpage: http://www.cpa.org.au>
Subscription rates on request.

******************************

Better manager of the system

The 20th anniversary of the election of the Hawke Labor Government on 
March 5, 1983 has been marked by feature articles in the daily 
newspapers. The most extensive coverage was carried by the Australian 
Financial Review (AFR) which is not surprising. Hawke always claimed 
that the Labor Party was a better manager of the system than the 
Liberals. And by "the system", he meant the capitalist system.

The AFR writes, "The Hawke-Keating government unleashed a business
revolution that dramatically reshaped the Australian economy". This
"revolution" was the adoption of economic rationalist policies - 
competition policy, deregulation, privatisation, "free trade", floating 
the dollar, the sidelining of Awards in favour of enterprise bargaining, 
superannuation, abandonment of wage indexation to name a few.

Says the AFR: "the Hawke-Keating reforms were overwhelmingly positive 
for business."

Before becoming Prime Minister, Hawke was the President of the ACTU and 
in that position became notorious as a "Mr Fixxit". A case in point was 
the South East Queensland Electricity Board (SEQEB) strike struggle over 
the introduction of individual work contracts. The Electricity workers 
waged a long struggle with widespread popular and trade union support. 
At a critical point, Hawke intervened and on the basis of promises the 
dispute was "settled" but the workers were sold out. The airlines 
dispute was another. Hawke introduced Airforce pilots and assisted the 
entry of foreign pilots to scab on the Ansett pilots to defeat their 
demands.

Superannuation was sold to the trade union movement as the means by 
which workers could guarantee an income in their retirement. But it had 
other objectives. The first was to reduce the Government's obligation to 
pay old age pensions. The second was to provide investment capital for 
the finance sector, where the workers' savings were put at risk, rather 
than the private capital of those doing the investment.

Superannuation funds have accumulated billions of dollars out of 
workers' pockets - money that should have been paid as wages. Much of it 
has been invested by fund managers on the share markets and has become 
an enormous source of capital investments. As an AFR article says, 
"Workers weaned off pension[s], on to stocks".

But as the value of stocks has plummeted so have super funds. In the 
last year $50 billion has been lopped off the value of superannuation 
funds as a result of the slump in share values. In the event of a 
serious economic slump some funds and every cent of the money put aside 
by workers could be wiped out.

"Competition policy" was going to ensure "competition" between companies 
and lower prices. The hidden agenda of competition policy was to 
deregulate industry (e.g. milk and wheat marketing) and privatise the 
then existing public enterprises. It was claimed that public enterprises 
had an unfair advantage over private companies and that there had to be 
a "level playing field". Using these arguments the Commonwealth Bank, 
Qantas, government insurance offices, pubic transport, water supply, 
electricity, etc, have been privatised.

Have prices been controlled or gone down? Everyone knows that this is a
cruel joke.

The agreement between the Labor Government and the ACTU known as the 
Accord was a cornerstone of the Labor Party's real agenda. It was sold 
by claiming that the trade union movement could achieve its claims if 
they sat around the table and co-operated with the employers. Many fell 
for this nonsense including some who claimed to be left-wing trade union 
officials.

This unsound approach opened the door to the gutting of the award 
system, the reduction of real wages, the loss of working conditions and 
undermining of health and safety in the workplace. Unpaid overtime 
became widespread together with massive casualisation and part-time 
work. Progress made on women's wages and putting an end to 
discrimination was reversed. The trade union movement was weakened in 
the eyes of many workers. Trade Unions were seen to be unable and often 
unwilling to defend and fight for the needs of their members. Trade 
Union membership slumped from about 55 percent of the employed workforce 
to the present 20-25 percent.

The Hawke-Keating Governments were a bonanza for business and a pain for
workers. But then, that is what being a better manager of the system is 
all about. There is little for workers to commemorate!

****************************************************************************

-- 
--

           Leftlink - Australia's Broad Left Mailing List
                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Archived at http://www.cat.org.au/lists/leftlink/

Sponsored by Melbourne's New International Bookshop
Sub: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsub: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Reply via email to