Jean
True, the Legacy feature that automatically assigns the next sequential
FileID can not be used when prefacing the FileID with a letter.

However, the advantage of using the letter prefix to identify record
category in my opinion outweighs the benefit of automatically assigned
sequential FileIDs.  I manually assign the next sequential FileID for my
record categories.  This is made easy by just looking at what my last
number was for that category.

Without the use of a category prefix, I don't know if I'm looking for a
wedding napkin or old uncle Joe's banjo. 

In an ideal world the program would provide a customized option to use
category prefixes.  Then automatically assign the next sequential FileID
number when that prefix is used.  I don't see that happening.

Whether you choose to use category prefixes or not, your method of
filing and use of FileIDs are right on.

Gary
Near St Louis MO USA

  -----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jean
van horn
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:43 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files ...a bit
more still

Gary,

I tried using a letter in front of the number for my adoptive family 
database so that when I'm gone that database could be willed to
descendants 
of that family and separated by my children easily. The problem is that
then 
the ability to see what the next number is in "file id" in Legacy is
lost, 
so I discarded that and do not put a letter in front of anything.

An alphabetical report would be helpful. Right now I also have a
database in 
Works where I can search on any field and within fields (ie, family name

field with several names in it separated by two spaces) to find sources
and 
info. This way the adoptive family sources could be separated via this
sort.
Jean

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Olds-Wills-Anderson-Simonson-Hodges-Harris-Liikala-Jukkara-" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 3:45 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files ...a bit
more 
still


> Jean's points are dead on.  Excerpts below.
>
> Only one suggestion, assign records to categories before assigning
File
> Numbers.  Thus, census records would be C0001, newspaper articles
would
> be N0001, photographs would be P0001, and so on.  Just as would be
done
> in a library system.  I can provide more on categories if requested.
>
> A record filing system is a record filing system.  It is a system for
> filing and retrieving records.  Don't make it be something it's not,
> it's not for people identification and association.  That's best
handled
> by programs like Legacy.
>
> Please join me in lobbying Legacy to add a report for File Numbers
> sorted alphabetically which would list LName, FName/MI, FileNumber,
> Date, Caption, and Description.
>
> Gary
> Near St Louis MO USA





Have you unlocked the real power of Legacy? Legacy 6.0 Deluxe has 92 features 
not found in the Standard Edition. Learn more about these features at 
http://legacyfamilytree.com/DeluxeEdition.asp.

Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at: 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

For online technical support, please visit 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


  • RE: [LegacyUG] ... Olds-Wills-Anderson-Simonson Hodges-Harris-Liikala-Jukkara
    • Re: [Legac... Bob Janice
    • RE: [Legac... Cathy
      • RE: [L... Olds-Wills-Anderson-Simonson Hodges-Harris-Liikala-Jukkara
    • [LegacyUG]... Olds-Wills-Anderson-Simonson Hodges-Harris-Liikala-Jukkara
      • Re: [L... Cathy
        • RE... Olds-Wills-Anderson-Simonson Hodges-Harris-Liikala-Jukkara
          • ... Jan Roberts
            • ... David S Brookes
              • ... Olds-Wills-Anderson-Simonson Hodges-Harris-Liikala-Jukkara
                • ... David S Brookes

Reply via email to