I also found my sources list was growing so large and went to Events to
indicate the sourcing information for that particular event/individual.  It
seemed to me that, after I had put all the relevant information in the Event
boxes, I was duplicating it to then put it into sources.  But again, the
program is great because if we are not professional genealogists we can
tailor it to suit ourselves.  And in the long run, all the information the
future reader will need is still there.  It's a difference of opinion and
procedure but it works great for me.
Leonard


On 10/21/07, June <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Further to discussions about lumping or splitting sources, if what I am
> doing is simply for the benefit of me and my family cannot events be used in
> the same way rather than sources. I have been entering things through events
> and then in the text part of that event have indicated further details. If I
> want to check if the baptism has been verified x 3,  I only have to check
> the notes attached to the events. Does anyone else do it this way?
>
>
>
> Thanks - June
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>    
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp>
> Archived messages:
>    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: 
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Help.asp>
> To unsubscribe: 
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp>
>




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to