Arnold, Whilst refuting the allegation the I hijacked your thread, I will try and bring it back to the point, by saying that I would probably use Internet> Website, Generic.
Ron Ferguson _____________________________________________________________________ *New Tutorial* Publish your Web Pages - Blogs http://www.fergys.co.uk View the Grimshaw Family Tree at: http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _____________________________________________________________________ > Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:01:27 -0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Sourcing a family association using SourceWriter > template > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > > Steve and Ron, > Please do NOT hijack my thread. Start your own. > Too often everyone goes crazy over posts like these and then > those with helpful answers to me soon lose interest in the underlying post. > > Everyone, > Please no one reply to *this* post. > Thank you. > > > > At 10:26 AM 11/22/2008, you wrote: > > >>Steve, >> >>The Asscociation is a secondary source and the confidence should be >>recorded as such. >> >>BTW it is far from boneheaded to not accept HTML on a users site: >> >>1) Read up on virus transmission in html emails >>2) Some people have their email program set to refuse html >>3) They are much larger than text files, so think of those how are >>not able to get broadband and must use dial-up - and pay on the size >>of the file. >> >>The latter point is also why the Legacy information at the end of >>every email should be trimmed. See Etiquette - that address is in >>the stuff at the end. >> >>Ron Ferguson >> >> >> >>> Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:04:01 -0800 >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com >>> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing a family association using >> SourceWriter template >>> >>> (Re-sent in plain text because I forgot about this group's boneheaded >>> no-HTML policy. Apologies since I'm sure someone will complain.) >>> >>> Arnold, >>> >>> Personally I wouldn't consider the Strong Family Association to be the >>> source, but rather to be the repository from which you obtained new >>> sources. The actual source(s) would the data that they cite on the >>> website (e.g. US census records, baptismal records, family histories >>> submitted by other genealogists, etc.) Hopefully they list their >>> sources, because otherwise I wouldn't lend much credence to what's >>> listed there until I verified it myself with primary sources. >>> >>> Hope that helps, >>> Steve Voght >>> >>>> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Arnold Sprague wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I gathered some new information on my Strong ancestors from the >> website of The Strong Family Association of America, Inc. >>>>> . >>>>> I scrolled through Legacy's Source Template Index and am not >> sure that any of the entries will work for the association. >>>>> I would like to source the Strong information I gather to this >> group, but do not know where to start. >>>>> Help and thank you in advance. > _________________________________________________________________ Win £1000 John Lewis shopping sprees with BigSnapSearch.com http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/117442309/direct/01/ Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
