Hi Scott, Doing a search in the SourceWriter templates for "gedcom" there is a gedcom template that even references Mill's _EE_. However, this template does not address "online family trees", but rather addresses actual gedcom files obtained from another researcher.
I believe that for the online family trees, the generic "online database" template would work, with fields filled out to match _EE_ as appropriate. (see page 156 - section 3.44). Hope this helps, Dan Bateham ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Hall" <seh0...@gmail.com> To: <LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 12:56 PM Subject: [LegacyUG] Missing citation in Mills' book for family trees found online? OK, Elizabeth Shown Mills fans ... while I like Mills' book a lot, it still seems a little light on information found online. I can find no information on how to properly cite family trees and GEDCOMs files published to the web. ProGenealogists provides guidance, but beause Legacy Source Writer's tempates are based on Mills book and she seem to omit this source, I can't find a good Source Writer template to use. Even though the data extracted is a secondary source, until it is verified and repalced with a primary source, I want to ensure its cited properly. For all you neurotic, gotta-get-the-citation-right researchers like me, which template do you use? Thanks, Scott Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
