Ron and Leo,

Direct Line set as Preferred; Check/Repair run; Set Relationships done.

I was referring to the Relationship Calculator, not the Set Relationships
tool.  The identification of half relationships seems to have been fixed in
both tools, however the RC is broken beyond repair for me.  If someone
thinks it works o.k. now, I'd sure appreciate help on I can get it to work
for me.  Specifically, many errors show up when you select "Print" and then
"Preview."  In the example I'm looking at now, the "Common Ancestor" shown
on the RC screen is not the same as the "Common Ancestor" shown on the print
preview screen.  If there are several relationships between the same two
individuals and the option to print all the relationships is chosen, the
preview shows complete garbage.  As someone has reported previously, some
relationships shown on the RC screen are duplicates.

As I said, I give up.

John S. Adams
Hermosa Beach, CA

--------------------------------------------------
From: "leo macdonald" <macdonald...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:53 AM
To: <LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com>
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] v7.4.0.39 - Relationship Calculator

>
> Hi Ron and John,
>
> I'm just thankful that it is now working and going through the process, I
> have noticed and reported back to Jim at Technical Support that there is a
> difference in the number of pathways which are now detected as compaired
> to the number detected prior to the April 25th update.
>
> Using my perferred starting person with the same settings that I always
> use, 10 closest relationships and 0 closest pathways, the program now goes
> through 10,000 less than before, so something has changed.
>
> Leo
>
> ----------------------------------------
>> From: ronfergy....@tiscali.co.uk
>> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
>> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] v7.4.0.39 - Relationship Calculator
>> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:21:17 +0100
>>
>> John,
>>
>> Mine is working perfectly and faster than ever!
>>
>> Which option are you using?
>> Have you set the Direct Line as the preferred?
>> Have you set relationships?
>> Have you tried a check/repair?
>>
>> Ron Ferguson
>> _____________________________________________________
>> ____________________________________________________
>>
>>
>> John S. Adams wrote:
>>> Sorry to have to report that in the few tests I've run, the RC is
>>> worse. I give up.
>>>
>>> John S. Adams
>>> Hermosa Beach, CA




Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to