On 2010/07/01 21:19, [email protected] wrote: > I also deliberately scan at around 1000-1200 dpi in case anyone wants a > hard copy later on, in which case it will be of hopefully photographic > quality. And if there are any glaring scratches or tears, I touch them > up too.
Aren't you operating under a misconception here? Unless your photograph comes from high-definition film stock or a large plate, scanning at high resolutions will do nothing to show detail that isn't already there. -- Regards, Mike Fry Johannesburg Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
