Well, then, double shame on me :-) Goes to show the truth of what my husband used to tell me, "you know what happens when you assume".
I've gone back and checked some of my entries and find events that do not carry the same source citation as the vital events so I must have used it correctly at least some of the time. Still doesn't ease my pain, though, as I'm certain I also used it incorrectly many times. :-( Anyway, my thanks for the tip, going forward. My bad; I certainly should have known, I didn't, but do now. Mary -----Original Message----- From: Dennis M. Kowallek [mailto:kowal...@iglou.com] On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:47:34 -0500, "Mary Fowler Leek" <ml...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >I cannot for the life of me understand why this is now working as it is. It has worked this way as far back as I remember (2001). -- Dennis Kowallek (LTools) Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
