On 2011/08/06 01:09, Dick Nixon wrote: > If you look in the archives, there are several discussions over the > years about how BBD and M are handled differently than the user > selected events. Some of us add those as user events and do not use > the 'standard' ones. This has more to do with how and where the > events, and their notes, appear in the family group sheet and other > reports. They are not treated the same.... Or look closely at the > chronology report.....it does a better job of placing them.
True. But why not allow the users to format the sentences associated with these events to their own choices? Surely a precedent has already been set with the partial wording options that can be applied to a marriage (Default and individual marriages). What's wrong with doing something similar for the other, Vital events? -- Regards, Mike Fry Johannesburg Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
