I would say the repository is you in this instance, because you have the copy of the email (either a paper version or stored on your computer.)
Cheers Jan -----Original Message----- From: Jerry [mailto:jerrysemailgro...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 11 November 2011 05:21 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources Yeah, that's kind of my thinking also, but I still don't have a good understanding of REPOSITORIES? Could it be constructed so that personal knowledge of is the source and the email is the repository?? Jerry Paula Ryburn <paula.ryb...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >Is it equally valid to call it "Personal Knowledge" and include the method of >transfer of that knowledge to you in the detail citation? Then everything from >that person would sort together? Or is that just a master source list Name >question? (not a template question) Thx. > --Paula in Texas Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
