Hopefully, I will not sound too harsh, but my genealogical research goals do not
include anything about the size of my Location list.

I think the Location AKA could work just like the Name AKA does, including how
it looks in lists.  If you want to use AKA's, you want to see them, too.  And
thinking a bit on this particular case:  All the "old" names for the location
would have the same "present day" AKA, so that's really only adding one.  (well,
at least that's how I would use it)
 --Paula in Texas
Researching:  Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman
Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie Doody Ellis Exline Field
Floran Floyd Gates Goodale Gordon Gump Hale Harbaugh Hind Hopkins Hughes Hurdle
Jones Klein Koyle Laswell McDonald Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn
Sanford Short Singer Sullivan Weller Williams




________________________________
From: Jerry <jerrysemailgro...@gmail.com>
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Sun, February 5, 2012 2:27:30 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Event Locations

Yes, Michele, but you don't have to "mess up" your master location list to do
that.  You can accomplish the same thing with the note fields adjacent to
location.  Sorry, but I don't think I could ever be convinced to put seven
different location names for the exact same spot on the map when the note field
will work for that.  It is time for the gedcom standard to be updated to match
computer technology.  Both the aka location and latititde/longitude ideas seem
worthy of consideration.  Thanks for listening.  Jerry in Michigan

cranberryf...@cobridge.tv wrote:

>You should record the location as it was at the time of the event unless you
>keep your research completely to yourself and never share it with anyone.
>If you share the info in any way, shape or form, you really should conform
>to how everyone else does it or it will only cause confusion :) :) :)
>
>Michele
>
>
>
>Legacy User Group guidelines:
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
>Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our
>blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
>To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>

Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to