Paula, my answer only included tagging in order that I can see at a glance who 
is part of my direct descendant tree.  This can be done with the Focus Group 
process only and used directly for exporting or other functions using the 
resultant search list created.

You don't have to Tag with Focus Groups.



Alan Pereira



From: Paula Ryburn [mailto:paula.ryb...@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: 25 February 2012 16:46
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Focus groups vs. tagging



I was looking forward to clarification on how & why to use focus groups instead 
of tagging, but so far I am unconvinced, as both answers posted thus far seem 
to include the step of tagging somewhere in their process anyway.  Or have I 
misread the two replies?



It seems focus groups and tagging (or really the search process to determine 
who to tag) operate the same way, but tags have the advantage of allowing you 
to move through the resulting list of tagged people easily... using the "next 
tagged" arrow at the bottom of the family view.  Just because individuals are 
in a focus group, doesn't give you quick access to those individuals for the 
purposes of, say, fixing an error.



On the other hand, I have recently learned I can fix a whole lot of things 
straight from the Search Results, which would require neither tags nor a focus 
group.



In pondering further as I typed, I suppose the advantage to defining a focus 
group comes when you are routinely exporting or reporting, because the list of 
individuals to include is dynamically built -- saving you the steps of 
re-running the search and tagging the results to be sure to include newly-added 
individuals, then exporting / reporting on tagged individuals.



"It depends" on your purpose for identifying a set of individuals... right?



--Paula in Texas
Researching: Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman 
Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie Doody Ellis Exline Field 
Floran Floyd Gates Goodale Gordon Gump Hale Harbaugh Hind Hopkins Hughes Hurdle 
Jones Klein Koyle Laswell McDonald Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche 
Ryburn Sanford Short Singer Sullivan Weller Williams





  _____

From: Ron Taylor <doit4...@yahoo.com>
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Sat, February 25, 2012 9:15:13 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Focus groups vs. tagging


A tag is an actual field in the individual or marriage record which can be used 
in a search to locate those records with the tag on or off.

A focus group is a collection of criteria that can be used as the logic to 
filter a sub-set of the database dynamically and is not the actual records.  
The results of a search for records in the focus group could be tagged but as 
more records are added to the database, the new ones will not be automatically 
tagged when they satisfy the criteria in the focus group.  A fresh search for 
the focus group would identify every record in that filter.

One function of the focus group is to export a portion of the database.  
Records filtered by the focus group can easily be pushed out to a separate file 
which can then be sent to another researcher with only those records that are 
of interest for him/her.  I find it very useful in Legacy to execute a detailed 
search for the focus group, tag the search results, and then in the Legacy 
Export...check the radio button "All records with an individual tag of:", set 
the tag number, and then check the three boxes under that selection.  Those 
boxes are labelled: "Export all Spouses of Tagged Individuals", "Export all 
Children of Tagged Individuals", and "Export all Parents of Tagged 
Individuals".  By checking those three optional boxes, not only are all the 
records in the focus group exported but also the individuals connected to them 
which essentially exports complete group sheets that include the tagged set.

In summary...a tag is temporary data and a focus group is a collection criteria 
used to filter records.  Focus groups can be saved and re-loaded for various 
purposes.  You could have a focus group for collaboration with Aunt Margaret 
and another for data sharing with Grandma Johnson.  I'm sure others have even 
more imaginative uses for these tools.

Ron Taylor



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to