If you don't mind showing more than one place name that is really the same exact location on the map, then you can use whatever variations you have. On the other hand, if you are like some of us who don't want to use extra place names unnecessarily, why not just explain the variations in the notes that are directly adjacent and a part of the location name field? As has been discussed many times on the list, it's a matter of your personal preferences more than anything. --Jerry - http://www.MerriamFamilyTree.org
On 03/28/2012 11:06 PM, Tony Rolfe wrote: > I have folk born in Little Stonham, Suffolk, England and in Stonham > Parva, Suffolk, England. These are actually the same place and the two > names seem to be used interchangeably, particularly in censuses. > > Similarly Great Stonham and Stonham Magna. > > For Little Stonham, most references say "Little Stonham, sometimes > called Stonham Parva,..." which seems to indicate that Little Stonham is > preferred. However the church is always referred to as "St. Mary's > Church, Stonham Parva". > > Does anyone have any ideas how best to handle this? > > Thanks > > Tony > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
