On 15/07/2012 18:50, JLB wrote: > I think it's possible the reason Legacy won't export to RTF is because > RTF does not do the sophisticated formatting necessary, generally > speaking, to make a family group sheet look the way it should. > > Like I said earlier you can export to HTML and then copy and paste into > RTF. In your case, I doubt you're going to like the result of it. If you > can get it to go to Word instead, that would probably look a lot better.
I just created a FGS in HTML and opened it in Word. It didn't have the columns seen in the Legacy Preview but looked perfect to me. The only small problem I had was that it didn't automatically delete the endnotes (Sources) when I deleted a mark and didn't update the numbering. I think I would want to create the Source Citations from scratch to produce the required document this way, but I'm not sure it wouldn't be better to do it through Legacy in the manner I suggested earlier. -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
