I was aware in the past of some users who were apparently escorted off permanently, but do not remember details. I have not noticed many 'refusers' since most stop before the third time. I don't police the list. There are others who do, hooray for them. Rich in LA CA
--- On Mon, 9/17/12, Ron Bernier <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Ron Bernier <[email protected]> > Subject: Re[2]: [LegacyUG] attachements, plain text > To: [email protected] > Date: Monday, September 17, 2012, 8:30 AM > Quite simply, because there are > those who refuse to follow > rules/requests. I will repeat what others have said > previously, if a > user refuses to adhere to the rules/requests, they should be > given one > warning. If the user repeats the violation they should > be removed from > the list for a predetermined amount of time - I.E. - 1st > violation 1 > month "suspension", 2nd violation 3 month "suspension", 3rd > violation > permanent removal from the list. Unfortunately, the > Millennia folks > would never implement such a system because they wouldn't > want to upset > any of their customers. There are several subscribers > to this list who > have repeatedly made it clear they do not care what the > rules of the > list are. They insis that they will send their emails > to the list in > any format that they want to. Apparently the Millennia > feel that it is > acceptable for the violators to cause potential undue > hardship to those > who are on dialup and/or risk sending a hidden virus/malware > to other > subscribers of the list. > > Ron Bernier, > Woonsocket, RI > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "RICHARD SCHULTHIES" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: 9/17/2012 10:48:26 AM > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] attachements, plain text > >Why should Legacy have to purchase software and increase > cost when people should be expected to follow > rules/requests. > >Rich in LA CA > > > >--- On Sun, 9/16/12, Ron Bernier < > >[email protected] > >> wrote: > > > > > >> > >>From: Ron Bernier < > >>[email protected] > >>> > >>Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] attachements, plain text > >>To: > >>[email protected] > >> > >>Date: Sunday, September 16, 2012, 11:22 AM > >>Michelle, > >> > >>Legacy support has always maintained that there > software > >>cannot block > >>attachments. They always relied on users to > refrain > >>from sending > >>attachments and/or HTML messages. Finally thy > gave up > >>on saying no > >>HTML because some users simply refused to follow > the > >>guidelines. At > >>least, they haven't caved on attachments even though > some > >>users ignore > >>that also. It would be really nice if they > would look > >>into software > >>that can block/reject messages sent to the list in > HTML > >>and/or > >>attachments, but it doesn't look like that will > ever > >>happen. > >> > >>Ron Bernier > >>Sent from my iPad > >> > >> > > > > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 > 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) > and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
