On 15/09/2020 17:34, Chris Swann wrote:
Hi all,
I have a document which lists 2 of my relatives. I can work out that
they were both Christened on the same day in 1596 BUT there is
something else which mentions a birth date of 1593.
Some of the trees I have seen have included these two individuals as
potential twins being born and christened together in 1596 but I think
that one of them was born back in 1593 where I already have a John
born in 1593.
Is there anyone who is good at deciphering olde English so that I can
try and resolve this conundrum?
Thanks in advance,
Chris Swann
Thanks for all the replies. I have the "batch" approach in my tree as
well and even one of my grandmothers who only got christened in order to
get married at about 28 years of age!!
BUT, the family I am looking at are way back in the late 1500's to mid
1600's and all of the children are literally hatched and christened
within a day or so.
Some are even hatched and dispatched without even time for a christening
which is why the two that I am looking at are SO strange.
I am 99.9% certain that the male has already been recorded earlier in
the tree and has been included again through copy and paste for loads of
trees.
Hoping I can get to the bottom of things once and for all.
Chris S
--
LegacyUserGroup mailing list
LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
