As I said, you can not prove a negative -- not now and certainly not then. The very best you can say is an individual had "no acknowledged issue" which is still to murky to warrant a check off.
Wm Voss -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sutliff Sent: Friday, 27 June, 2003 17:38 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Double Dating Louise, Thanks very much for the suggestion. Unfortunately this would create the suggestion of a spouse where there may or may not have been a spouse. As things are currently, you can either indicate someone was married with no children or never married. What I am requesting is the ability to indicate that there is no issue from a person where you cannot document if there were married or not, but are cited in primary and secondary sources as not leaving issue. Most of my work is in the pre-1600 period and I work from fines, charters, maritagiums, inquisitions post mortem and the like. I am doing work arounds now and have been since adopting Legacy a few years back. I can continue to do so and only make the request to make things a bit easier. Nevertheless, many thanks for your thoughts of help. Henry <messages snipped> Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
