Kristian in Norway
(Remember Alternative dates in Events)
P� Fri, 1 Aug 2003 16:41:31 -0700, skrev Lisa Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You don't think it's a problem to have sources numbers after each element in
a date (i.e., day, month, year)?
Lisa
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kristian Fjeldsg�rd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Independent sourcing: was: Separating date sources
from place sources suggestion
Lisa
I don't think proper sourcing is ugly, it shows you have done proper work.
It's allso a topic about detailed sourcing, using the "Show list" feature
that has been discussed on this list more than once.
I believ that for the basic informations, names and birth/death
informatioan every part should be sources individually, even if I get many
footnotes.
Kristian in Norway
P� Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:09:40 -0700, skrev Lisa Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I can understand your frustration, I share it, but I'm wondering how you
> want this foot-noted:
>
> 17(1) Jan (2) 1876 (3) etc
>
> Could get pretty ugly.Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/
To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
-- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/
To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
