Does birth recorded as Q4 1970 = 34 years?
This would be a better test.
IMHO,
Jim S
Jan Roberts wrote:
I have 'inherited' (pardon the pun) some quarterly dates from a fellow
researcher. He recorded them as Q1 1970 etc. I imported them into my
Legacy database and haven't found them to be a problem. The age is
still calculated accurately e.g. a birth recorded as Q1 1970 = 35 years
old.
Just my two penneth worth.
Cheers
Jan
----- Original Message ----- From: "Karen Sipe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 1:29 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] RE:Using quarterly dates in Legacy
Since an BMD was recorded as soon after it happened as possible would
using
the first month of a quarter be better? A birth on Dec 31 1845 would
be in
the first quarter of the nest year so by using March 1855 you are not
only
Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/
To unsubscribe please visit:
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
