Hi Matt
That is quite correct and I too have many such instances. I do, however, put
a note in the file to explain. This is illustrated at:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/genealogy/537.html
Ron Ferguson
____________________________________
For Genealogy, Software and Social visit:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
View Individual Trees
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/Grimshaw/
____________________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 23 November 2005 23:06
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] ghost location FOUND!!
Using the children's surname as the father's surname could be incorrect. I
have several instances where the mother is known and the father is not but
the children use the mother's maiden name as their surname
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of BE Kelly
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 8:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] ghost location FOUND!!
I suggest that you create at least one person for these
marriages. If you know the surname of the family then as Ron
Ferguson suggested create a husband with that surname. If you do
any merging, these marriages with blank people will multiply. to
see a full explanation of why they exist visit the archives and
see the email from Ed Barnard dated 21 Jul 2005 with subject
Large Files. If you cannot find it Email me off list and I will
forward a copy to you.
Brian Kelly
Rockland, ON, Canada
Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/
To unsubscribe please visit:
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
