On Thursday 17 February 2005 06:43, Jason Hunter wrote: > I agree with Fitz too. I especially don't like that it eats actual > Reply-To headers. > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
That is up to the mailing list software. For instance, lists.ibiblio.org doesn't do that, and it seems that many client will in such case insert both the mailing list address and the explicit Reply-To. (I have not checked what happens here at ASF, though. Just pointing out that it does not have to be like that.) Cheers Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
