Can someone with BXA experience explain why all Apache software isn't
eligible for "EAR99 (NLR)" status? I understand "NLR" to mean that "no
license is required." /Larry
Lawrence Rosen
Rosenlaw & Einschlag, technology law offices (www.rosenlaw.com)
3001 King Ranch Road, Ukiah, CA 95482
707-485-1242 ● fax: 707-485-1243
Author of “Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom
and Intellectual Property Law” (Prentice Hall 2004)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Behlendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 5:06 PM
> To: William A. Rowe, Jr.
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Export Control Revisited AGAIN
>
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > What position should the ASF assume for this case? Which is the
> > appropriate forum to discuss this?
>
> This is the appropriate forum for now; if the people on this list who have
> BXA experience don't have the time to comment, then we can assign this to
> Robyn to research and answer for us. Let's give it a few more days? Ben?
> Anyone?
>
> Brian
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
> only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
