Martijn van Exel wrote: > We're considering the agreement between NLNet and OpenStreetMap-NL for > a €15k grant for software development. > It states that 'This software platform will be built in open source > under GPLv3 license'. It is pointed out that that may be too > restrictive, as projects being included in the funding might already > be under development under GPLv2. What do you think?
Just in case: if there's any work on Potlatch (which I doubt), Potlatch is public domain, and I would obviously prefer that it stays that way. So in the case of anything being added to Potlatch under the GPL, I'll probably end up replacing it with a PD equivalent... which would be a shame, as I'd rather spend the time adding new features. cheers Richard _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-talk