Quoting "Robert (Jamie) Munro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Rob Myers wrote: > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > | > |> Therefore, I argue that CC-BY-SA 3.0 should be okay, given we're > talking > |> about a "Derivative Work". > | > | What is the derivative work in this scenario? > > The printed map. It will probably be based on OSMarender output, then > loaded into Illustrator, tidied up, and then have things added and > edited. But either way, the printed map is not the data, it's derived > from the data.
If the map is modified then yes it's a derivative and can have the licence upgraded. The rest of the leaflet will not be a derivative. This is due to OSM's (informal?) position on what constitutes a derivative. - Rob. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-talk
