> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Liz > Sent: 28 September 2008 10:11 > To: Licensing and other legal discussions. > Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Process for agreeing the new licence > > On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Peter Miller wrote: > > I agree that participation is low on this list, possibly main of the 191 > > subscribers to legal-talk are listening but not posting. The basic > message > > to these people is speak up now if you are unhappy. Please don't sit > back > > now and then vote against it when we are done. > > I feel like a late comer and I don't understand completely about licence > issues. > So I'm listening now, rather than sound like I'm poorly informed > ;-)
Join the club! The good thing about where we are now is we are able to decide what licence we do want within some limits. In the past most of the discussion on this list has been about how one might or might not interpret a licence that was not designed for the purpose. Regards, Peter > > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
