> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Ward > Sent: 04 October 2008 13:17 > To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] A very brief brief for our new > licence > > On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 02:09:09PM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > One thing to keep in mind is that we should avoid explicitly naming > > OpenStreetMap in the license. > > Agreed. This would also make the licence unusable by anyone other than > "OpenStreetMap" without modification (one of my most hated things when > having to deal with software under various licences).
And of course a Collective database and a Derivative Database would probably have a different name anyway because a combination of ODBL OpenStreetMap data and the US Census data would be a Collective Database (assuming it was integrated outside the OSM project) and therefore it should not be called OpenStreetMap. The notices from all the elements of the Collective Database should of course all be retained in the Collective DB including the ones on the OSM DB. Regards, Peter > > Simon > -- > A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a > simple system that works.-John Gall _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
