El Jueves, 9 de Octubre de 2008, Simon Ward escribió: > In the preamble for the (old) ODbL draft, it advised that it should be > used with another licence for contents, the ODbL being designed to > protect database rights.
Yeah, the Factual Information License. I suppose that the idea is to enforce
the ODbL + FIL license duo.
> I believe many contributions would deserve some protection in their own
> right, they’re not simply “facts”. How will this be handled?
Well, my point of view is that individual bits of OSM data are indeed facts.
Could you ellaborate some use case where some piece of OSM data would require
some protection on its own?
--
----------------------------------
Iván Sánchez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I must have a prodigious quantity of mind; it takes me as much as a
week sometimes to make it up.
-- Mark Twain, "The Innocents Abroad"
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
