On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Richard Fairhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Frederik Ramm wrote: > > > 2. if yes, add some sort of sponge wording like "within a reasonable > > time frame" to alleviate the problem for people who try to process > > "current" data. > > It only says "you must also _offer_ to recipients" (my emphasis), not > "you must provide in case anyone wants it" - it's like the GPL in > that regard. So you don't have to upload a new dump of the whole > derivative db (or a diff of your changes) every time you update with > a minute diff; you could simply write "e-mail me here for a copy" and > supply it on demand. > And, of course, the same rules will also apply to the main OSM database, complete with history (but not user details). How big is it now? > > cheers > Richard > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
