Le lundi 02 mars 2009 à 13:28 +0100, Iván Sánchez Ortega a écrit : > > The Factual information license, seems to be a bit schizophrenic. It says
Huh? Now there are two licenses? > > both that facts are free, and that these free facts cannot be used without > > including a license... Facts are free, but I don’t think we can call all of the database’s content facts. When I input a road or a contour of a lake or a forest, it is a drawing, a representation of reality. Otherwise, anyone could make legal copies of nearly any photography (e.g. landscapes), claiming that they are only a recording of facts. I don’t think that such an argument would hold long in court… JC
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
