Hi, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Peter, Matt and others have done an excellent job at cleaning up and > structuring the Use Cases page on the Wiki. I have read all of the use > cases, made a few fixes, and I think they now sum up almost everything > that is important to us
One thing I forgot. My whole interpretation of the ODbL is based on the assumption that we have share-alike on interim databases used to create Produced Works, as was the case in the previous license draft and is explained in detail on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Suggested_Changes#The_.22interim_derivative_database.22_problem I think that there is broad consensus that the license needs to be fixed in this respect and that this was just an oversight and not a deliberate change. In the light of this, it would be not very productive for the lawyer to analyse the use cases based on the current wording of the ODbL, but he should take into account that we intend to make this change. Otherwise we will have to repeat the whole procedure after having made the change. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk