Well, translation itself wasn't a problem, but faithfully translating this rather important message made me read original several times carefully (and noticing this problem) and then reading the translation again, to make sure the very same ambiguity is kept (semantic equivalence) while being grammatically correct.
Stefan On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Russ Nelson <r...@cloudmade.com> wrote: > > On Jun 1, 2009, at 5:30 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: >> >> But even though that interpretation is rather laughable, the original >> poster is right: The wording might unnecessarily upset some people, so >> why not fix it. > > Agreed. The original question was "How do I translate this??", but > the answer is "well, it's pants anyway, so we should fix it." I think > that the consensus was to leave it as is until the ODbL comes along. > Change it all at once. > > -- > Russ Nelson - http://community.cloudmade.com/blog - > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:RussNelson > r...@cloudmade.com - Twitter: Russ_OSM - > http://openstreetmap.org/user/RussNelson > > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk > _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
