Andy Allan wrote: >Sent: 18 June 2009 6:29 PM >To: Licensing and other legal discussions. >Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant > >On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Russ Nelson<r...@cloudmade.com> wrote: > >> Yeah, I gotta admit that I'm wishing that we could protect the >> database as a database of geodata, whilst simultaneously allowing >> people to make derivative works that AREN'T a database of geodata, >> whilst also avoiding the TIGER trap of proprietary database >> improvements. Not sure that copyright allows for such fine control. > >If only we had a license that combined "contract fusion, database >fission and anti-copyright-matter" together into something that does >just that! All hail the ODbL! >
That sounds like soup. OSM does dragons. So just perhaps we are the Clangers! Cheers Andy >Cheers, >Andy > >> Perhaps we should be looking at our own behavior rather than the legal >> system? >> >> -- >> Russ Nelson - http://community.cloudmade.com/blog - >http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:RussNelson >> r...@cloudmade.com - Twitter: Russ_OSM - >http://openstreetmap.org/user/RussNelson >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> legal-talk mailing list >> legal-talk@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >> > >_______________________________________________ >legal-talk mailing list >legal-talk@openstreetmap.org >http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
