On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Simon Ward wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 06:31:59PM +0100, Mike Collinson wrote: > > Interesting. That is a lower figure than I personally was envisioning > > when we made the above definition, and therefore potentially > > disenfranchising of genuine OSM community. Perhaps we should review it, > > 3 calendar months in the last 12 perhaps?? Comments welcome. > > I have previously expressed my opinion that the definition was too > narrow, and seeing the statistics has strengthened that. > > I preferred scrapping the “activeness” check entirely (and still do), > but later suggested 18 months. > > I don’t think the requirement should necessarilly be that those > contributions be evenly spread out. E.g. months 1-3 of 18 should be > acceptable. > > Simon > I think that a lot of mappers are seasonal mappers - summer is a big impetus to go outside and see the world. So 'activity' needs to cover more than one year.
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk