On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:31, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > We *do* want to allow releasing produced works under PD. Note that we > are talking produced works here, not the data istself!
Maybe you do. Personally I'm pretty fond of the feature we have now where I know that any map that uses my CC-BY-SA data is freely available to me under the same license. I can see some of the negative aspects of that like integration with other datasets (which have been discussed to death in the ODbL debate). Pretty much they only thing I've ever gotten out of OSM personally (besides exercise and being able to use it on my GPS) is being able to use the various map renderings by ITO World, CloudMade etc. under the same free license as the data. All other things being equal I'd like things to stay that way, but that's just me. The discussion on the current issue of the week[1] seems to indicate that at least some people share that view, or at least feel like being pedantic in enforcing our current license. Even though they couldn't enforce that if we'd move to the ODbL. 1. http://blog.oobrien.com/2010/04/nike-grid/ _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk