On Aug 19, 2010, at 2:43 PM, John Smith wrote: > On 20 August 2010 06:40, SteveC <st...@asklater.com> wrote: >> >> On Aug 19, 2010, at 2:35 PM, John Smith wrote: >> >>> On 20 August 2010 06:32, SteveC <st...@asklater.com> wrote: >>>> Sure, but the OSMF's legal remit is very, very different to NearMaps. >>> >>> At this point in time we could be told anything by OSM-F and it has to >>> be taken on good faith that it was an actual opinion by a lawyer, >>> which can't be quoted directly. >> >> Oh you think the LWG might be lying or making it all up? I remember quite >> clearly WSGR's point that they can't advise the whole community, just the >> LWG/OSMF and that putting advice in public jeopardizes their ability to give >> advice. > > I said we have to take it on good faith the original intent is > conveyed, because it's someone's interpretation of what was said, > rather than a direct quote. > >> Maybe it's fine to publish advice as public opinion in Australia. I don't >> know. > > Stop quoting things out of context, neither OSM-F nor Nearmap gave > anything but interpretations of what was said, yet it's ok in your > opinion to question what they've said as being accurate but not OSM-F.
Where did I question it's accuracy? Steve stevecoast.com _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk