On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:04 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/8/31 Liz <ed...@billiau.net>: >> On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: >>> actually I feel that you treated this issue a little negligent. The >>> import guidelines stated since 5 March 2008 (quote): >>> "At the time of writing (spring 2008), >> >> >> well spring isn't in March (here) >> spring starts shortly >> so whoever wrote that was a little careless. > > > due to the fantastic wiki-software I was nevertheless able to derive > the date when this note was amended. > > cheers, > Martin > > btw.: The imported dataset seems to be this one (I followed a link in the > wiki): > Source: 25k Topographic Map > Map: VGI (Vojno Geografski Institut Jugoslavije) Yugoslav Military > Geographic Institute > Years: 1970's and early 80's > Classes: No classification (categorization) > Features: Line Feature Class > Coverage: about ~50% - 60% > > 30 year old uncategorized roads derived from 25k topographic maps. I > am aware that this is better than nothing, but it is IMHO not at all > an argument against the license change. >
that is just one file of many. we have other imports as well. more coming. thanks, mike _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
