On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> wrote: > > Andrew Harvey wrote: >> I am yet to see a license. > > http://opengeodata.org/microsoft-imagery-details has a set of terms of use > embedded in the post specifically for OSM. It's a Scribd document and > therefore requires Flash Player. There is also a PDF download link. If you > are unable to see the Scribd document then I've also uploaded it to > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing#Licence . > > Richard
Thanks Richard. I see that that PDF doesn't match http://www.microsoft.com/maps/product/terms.html That is problematic as the PDF is from a third party, and I wouldn't consider it legally solid. Even if http://www.microsoft.com/maps/product/terms.html was updated to the PDF, I couldn't find any sections which actually say that derived information can be copyrighted by the tracer and released under something CC BY-SA 2.0 compatible, or something to the same effect. On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Mike Dupont <jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com> wrote: > HI Andrew, > I am also worried about this, but dont want to be seen as a troll. > mike Neither do I. I just don't want a CC BY-SA database cluttered with non-compatible data. I've looked through everything that has been linked to, but still I cannot find the specific parts of Bing' s actual license/terms of conditions that allow this. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
