Rob
I'm not assuming anything.
But I believe it is fair to say that we (as in the larger OSM
community) don't have an handle on imports in any respect.
This is mainly due to a rather laisser faire approach in the
past, and simply that getting correct and formal approval for
an import is, both for the donor and the importer, a lot of
work (and more so in the future with a rather complex
license on the OSM side of things).
Looking forward, I don't see anyway around a more strict
regime. Clearly that will put more burden on the OSMF and
make imports less attractive, but I can't say that that is a bad
thing.
Simon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Myers" <r...@robmyers.org>
To: <legal-talk@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New phrase in section 2
On 07/12/10 22:53, Simon Poole wrote:
The LWG actually knows that this doesn't work, but obviously doesn't
want to actually do anything about it.
Please Assume Good Faith.
Also remember that the LWG meets once a week.
And that they do read this list.
- Rob.
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
