[Also posted to legal-talk, I suggest follow-ups go there.] In short…
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:52:04AM +0000, DavidD wrote: > On 20 December 2010 10:25, Simone Cortesi <sim...@cortesi.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:00, Stephen Hope <slh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I must admit, however, that basically handing the keys to the OSMF, […] > > this is no way different from GPL released software: > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.html > > Reading the link it looks like a very different situation. It’s different. > The OSMF clearly are not using the CT for the same reasons the FSF > require copyright assignment. To OSMF it seems to be largely a vehicle to prevent them from being able to change the licence. Simon -- A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works.—John Gall
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
