On 5 January 2011 22:15, Grant Slater <openstreet...@firefishy.com> wrote: > Repeated again... per account. The 1.0 version of the CT terms are not > clear, but the intent is per account.
And here I was thinking that contracts are about what's in them... No matter how much you'd wish and hope they'd have been more clear to begin with, it won't change the wording until you actually update what people can agree to. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
