On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Mike Collinson <m...@ayeltd.biz> wrote: > > At 01:10 AM 17/01/2011, Anthony wrote: >>https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1sC0SrG_R6OkRDdC3IJKlmDEn2pYTY2DZfcpSLFdiBBU > > Latest and greatest: > > https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1jY58fD3JyNUjzmecrpNejoOt4OnfHeEM-6o8rD5hCLY
More like latest and worst. Among other things, it now says "OSMF agrees to that it may only use or sub-license Your Contents as part of a database". :rolls eyes: >>And after the CC-BY-SA content is removed it means ODbL and >>DbCL? > > It means ODbL and DbCL once we have formally changed from CC-BY-SA. Which means what? Obviously OSMF has to remove the CC-BY-SA content *before* it can stop requiring people to submit data which is compatible with CC-BY-SA. What step is "formally changing from CC-BY-SA"? >>At what point, if any, does the database become one where OSMF can't >>switch back to CC-BY-SA without removing data? > > If 2/3 of active contributors vote for CC-BY-SA then OSMF can switch to it. > If there was some data in there that somehow could be distributed under ODbL > but not under CC-BY-SA, then it would either have to be removed or the IP > owners contacted for permission. At what point, if any, are people allowed to contribute data which is not compatible with CC-BY-SA? _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
