On 19 January 2011 02:10, andrzej zaborowski <balr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 18 January 2011 15:48, Mike Collinson <m...@ayeltd.biz> wrote: >> The links below show the wording we will formally release. I will confirm >> when it is done. We will then set up and announce mechanism whereby anyone >> who has accepted the 1.0 terms can upgrade, this will be entirely optional. >> >> The wording drops one suggested change - the addition of the phrase, "and >> to the extent that you are able to do so" or similar into clause (2) - we'd >> like to look at this one further as it has some potential side-effects as >> currently worded. > > With this new version, do you/others think it is OK for people who
So far all I've seen is contradicting information coming from people pushing for this change, one will say yes, another will say no because you have to give OSM-F the ability to change the license in future and they can't do this unless the information is done so by a copyright holder. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
