Sorry that I come quite late with this, it might be too late, and it was bothering me occasionally already for some months: if we really decided in the future to change the license, isn't 3 weeks a little short for such an important issue? I am referring to the time span required for an active contributor to reply to an email from the foundation. I feel this could be extended to say 6-8 weeks, because it is not completely improbable that someone is not reachable for 3 weeks, and I don't see a need for such a hurry in a case important like a license change (note we are now occupied with the current license change and discussions for over 3 years).
Of course a potential new license change would most likely not appear from nowhere, and implying a benevolent foundation this is maybe not an issue, still for formal reasons I think this time span could be extended. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
