Oh, and by the way 1/328 is still a violation as far as I know. In both cases (Waze and Google Maps), probably the amount of OSM data used proportionally to the rest of the world data was less than 1/328.
Cheers, Julio Costa Zambelli OpenStreetMap Chile julio.co...@openstreetmap.cl http://www.openstreetmap.cl/ Cel: +56(9)89981083 Postal: Casilla 9002, Correo 3, ViƱa del Mar, Chile On 30 March 2011 10:49, Richard Weait <rich...@weait.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Julio Costa Zambelli > <julio.co...@openstreetmap.cl> wrote: > > I was checking some papers at work today and accidentally found this > license > > violation (both Attribution and Share-Alike) by the RAND Corporation: > > > http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2011/RAND_MG1100.pdf > (Page > > 20(42)) > > It seems like a modified Marble screenshot to me (no attribution > > whatsoever). > > Yes, that map on the top half of page 42 of a 164 page report does > look similar to > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=36&lon=119.6&zoom=4&layers=M > > Rand appears to credit Central China Television. > > What do you suggest that the OSM community should do about this? >
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk