On 6 May 2011 22:16, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > The alternative would be to continue using CC-BY-SA in the face of > objections, and continue to misleading users about the effectiveness of the > license.
Still this sad tired old line, please come up with new FUD to keep things interesting. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
