Sadly I agree. Steve
stevecoast.com On Jun 5, 2011, at 4:19, Nick Hocking <nick.hock...@gmail.com> wrote: > The problem I have is a bit different. > > Someone (who has actively declined the CT) has been using nearmap to trace in > some roads under construction in the Canberra area. Some of these roads are > now complete and open to the public. > > It would be pointless of me to add information to the nearmapped ways (E.G > it's name) since it seems certain that these ways will be deleted from OSM. > However it is critical that these roads appear on the map right now, so that > emergency services have access to the most up-to-date information available. > > The only way, I see, out of this mess is for me to map a new set of > residential roads, using my actual GPS tracks, alongside the nearmapped ones, > make then properly routable, and maybe put a layer tag on them (for the > moment) to ensure that routers don't confuse the issue. > Once all the nearmap data has been removed then I would remove the layer tags. > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
